political writings

Français    English    Italiano    Español    Deutsch    عربي    русский    Português

Interview with Gilad Atzmon
The new inquisitors and their slanderous campaigns

Following the publication of the French edition of the “The Wandering Who ?” we asked the jazz star Gilad Atzmon to respond to some charges made against him by those who relentlessly try to stop him from speaking and spread his thoughts.

Gilad Atzmon

In his book Gilad is critical of Jewish identity politics. He is also highly critical of Jewish political domination within the Left and the Palestinian solidarity movement in particular. Collected by Silvia Cattori, Gilad’s answers expose the vacuous arguments employed by those who are determined to silence him by way of deception, intimidation and slander.

Silvia Cattori: Your book has just been published in French [1]. Without any promotion it is selling like hotcakes; despite the fact that members of U.J.F.P. (French Jewish Union for Peace) and I.J.A.N. (International Jewish Antizionist Network) launched a campaign to demonize you within the left and the Palestinian solidarity movement, six months before the French publication [2]. Did all theses attacks come as a surprise for you?

Gilad Atzmon: As you probably know I have been subject to these vile Jewish anti-Zionist campaigns for years. It is clear beyond doubt that I have managed to rock the boat. As it happens, I oppose any form of Jewish identity politics for being exclusive and racially oriented. Sadly enough, Like Zionists, many of the Jewish anti Zionist political cells are openly engaged in similar tribal, racially driven and exclusivist politics.

But there is also an ideological issue here. I openly contend that their entire terminology is misleading. Zionism is not colonialism, Israel is not Apartheid and the Israelis are not Zionists. Zionism is not colonialism for the Jewish ‘Settler State’ lacks a Jewish ‘Mother State’. Israel is not Apartheid for the Jewish State doesn’t want to exploit the Palestinians but to get rid of them. Israel is actually driven by Lebensraum (Living Space) philosophy. In other words, the Jewish State adopted the Nazi racist, expansionist ideology. But the Jews in our movement do not like the comparison with Nazi Germany. And also Israel is not exactly Zionism and the Israelis are not necessarily Zionists. Israel is the product of the Zionist ideology and the Israeli is basically a post revolutionary product. Hence, the Zionist/anti Zionist debate has very little significance in Israel or on Israeli politics.

In short, our entire terminology is misleading if not deceitful. I guess that I expose it all, and it is only natural that some people would prefer to kill the messenger.

Silvia Cattori: Many people accept that you are one of the most honest and sincere thinkers within the movement. Many respect and admire you a lot. You have had the courage to launch a much overdue debate, with the ability to confront your opponents with solid arguments. But the fact members of UJFP in France, or IJAN in Switzerland, are able to mount pressure on those who publish your writing or invite you, doesn’t it confirm what you argue in your book?

Gilad Atzmon: These Jewish anti Zionists cells are promoting a tribal and a marginal call; they are not many but yet very noisy. There is a clear Judeo-centric interest in keeping Jewish dissident organisations alive because they manage to maintain Jewish hegemony within the Palestinian solidarity discourse and beyond. Tragically enough, as long as this is the case, there is no chance for this movement to become a mass movement. Their message is too esoteric. For instance, why should anyone join a Palestinian solidarity group if one of the main aims of the movement is ‘fighting anti-Semitism’? If people are really interested in solidarity discourse they must make sure that it becomes a universal movement driven by compassion and ethical concerns.

This may take you by surprise, I actually would like to see as many Jews as possible in this movement; but they better be concerned with the real issues here i.e. Palestine plight and Jewish (political) power. I basically work on Jewish power; this is my favorite subject. I analyses Jewish identity and politics. And it is quite astonishing that the first people who actually attack me and try to silence me are people who claim to be ‘Jewish Palestinian solidarity activists’. This fact alone gives the impression that they are not actually what they claim to be i.e. solidarity activists. They are just another form of the ADL (equivalent of the LICRA in France).

Now, I am happy to debate this issue. If they want to debate me, come and confront me in London, NY or Paris…If I am wrong debate me, if I am incorrect please point out; did I get my facts wrong? Are my arguments flawed? Not really, no one is yet to point at a single mistake in my arguments or facts.

They are employing instead the old rabbinical tactics namely excommunication (herem). Why do they employ the Talmudic tactics? Probably because this is what they are, Talmudics. In spite of being the ‘people of the book’ they are engaged in an intensive horrific book burning. I believe that if they could nail me to the wood they probably would.

Silvia Cattori: Your detractors are bent on excluding you from the debate. It is easy for them to convince those who are unfamiliar with the key issues at stake, by alleging [3], in particular that your questioning of Judaism and Jewish anti-Zionism is fueled by "racism" because it attributes "to a whole group of people negative criteria to discredit them." Are they serious?

Gilad Atzmon: For sure they aren’t. I do not deal with Judaism. I don’t criticise Judaism though I allow myself refer critically to some Judaic interpretations. Yet, I am indeed extremely critical of Jewish politics and Jewish anti Zionism in particular.

But the first questions or examining to raise here are why should anyone stop oneself from questioning Judaism or Jewish politics or Jewish anti Zionism. Is Judaism beyond criticism? Is Jewish politics inherently innocent? Do Jewish anti Zionist believe themselves to be perfect? It is clear that my detractors adhere to the most banal and disturbing view that Jews are, somehow, chosen, Judaism is unquestionable and Jewish politics must be remained intact. I obviously do not accept this approach. Considering the negative impact of Jewish political lobbies and their push for another global war, criticising Jewish politics is the true meaning of peace loving.

I should also emphasize that concerns to do with ‘ethnicity’ or ‘race’ are foreign to my work. In my entire body of work, there is not a single reference to Jews as a ‘race’ or ‘ethnicity’. I am critical of Jewish ideology and Jewish culture. And I think that it is my right and my duty to criticise this culture and ideology; especially considering the fact IJAN, UJFP, ADL, The Zionist Federation or whatever, operate as Jews only groups and their motivations are far from being universal or ethical.

Silvia Cattori: And what about the “classical anti Semitism” they assign you?

Gilad Atzmon: It depends how they define ‘classical anti-Semitism’. It is true that nineteenth century brought about a school of thought highly critical of Jewish culture. We are familiar with the debate between Athens and Jerusalem. As far as I am concerned, this was and still is, a very interesting and enlightening debate. If anything, this debate led generations of Jews towards reformation, humanism and tolerance.

However, we all agree that anti-Semitism became a very problematic, vile and murderous trend when it is adopted biological determinist attitude. It basically became a Darwinist racist discourse. But shockingly enough, Jewish politics (left, right and centre) is soaked with such racist attitude. Can you Silvia join one of those ‘progressive’ Jews only groups? I don’t think so, and why not? Because you aren’t racially qualified.

Silvia Cattori: What about the systematic accusation of being a Holocaust denier?

Gilad Atzmon: Holocaust denial is obviously a Zionist notion. No one denies the Holocaust though some people debate some elements to do with its historicity. I myself do not engage in any historical debate for I am not a historian. However, I believe that history must be an open discourse. If anyone thinks that I am wrong here, he or she better produce a good argument. He or she will also have to explain what is wrong with Israeli Nakba law.

Silvia Cattori: When they claim that you “attack both anti-Zionist Jews and religious Jews in racist terms” do they lie?

Gilad Atzmon: For sure they lie. It is not true and a total misrepresentation of my writing and work. In my entire work you would not find any criticism of Judaism or Jews as people, race or ethnicity. I only refer to ideology not to people. I am indeed very critical of all “Jews only” political cells.

I consider some Jewish anti Zionists and left Zionists or AZZ (Anti Zionist Zionists) because they see their Jewishness as a primary political quality. Prominent Zionist Haim Weizmann said that ”there are no French Jews or British Jews or American Jews. There are only Jews who live in France, Jews who live in America and Jews who live in Britain”. This means that as far as Zionist ideology is concerned, Jewishness is a primary quality. Jewish anti-Zionists, or Jews for peace clearly see their Jewishness as a primary quality. If it would not be a primary quality they would join the peace and solidarity movement as ordinary people.

Jewish ideologies are very different on many issues. But they all agree on a few fundamental issues: choosiness, exclusiveness and segregation. The one thing they all believe is that Jews are somehow chosen. Otherwise, If Jews are not special, why do they operate in “Jews only” cells?

Silvia Cattori: They also criticize you for suggesting that “the Israeli colonialist oppression is not the product of Zionism but the outcome of Judaism”.

Gilad Atzmon: Again, a total misrepresentation. To start with, I do not talk about Judaism. Instead I discuss Jewish ideology. I may ask what are the Judaic traces within a contemporary Jewish ideology. I would ask, for instance, how the Book of Deuteronomy filters into the Zionist thought. I would ask what is the meaning of The Book of Esther. But I also argue that it is not ‘Zionism’ that inflicts pain of the Palestinian people but the Jewish State; and it does it in the name of the Jewish people. If Israel defines itself as the Jewish State and its tanks are decorated with Jewish symbols we must be able to ask who are the Jews? What is Judaism and what is Jewishness? In my work, I differentiate between Zionism and Israeli discourse. I argue that Israel it is not driven by Zionism; and Zionism is, in particular, a Jewish Diasporas discourse that become more and more irrelevant to the oppression of the Palestinian people.

Silvia Cattori: Recently, you have also been criticized in a letter apparently written by Ali Abunimah and signed by a number of Palestinian activists. His arrogance has generated an avalanche of negative reactions against him [4]. Doesn’t this indicate that what is happening within the leadership of the Solidarity Movement is alarming? And also that the aspects which your book has put the finger on are terribly real?

Gilad Atzmon: This is indeed very sad, especially considering Ali Abunimah and others on this list being amongst the proponents of the One Democratic State. One would expect the advocates of One Democratic State to grasp the true meaning of tolerance and pluralism.

Silvia Cattori: Wouldn’t this be making the case for your detractors in the UJFP and IJAN? In Switzerland the Israelis Gabriel Ash or Caroline Finkelstein for example, who are part of IJAN and a pro Palestinian group in Geneva, signed a statement [5] against you. Doing that are they not working against one of the very rare brilliant ex Israeli intellectual, and as says Daniel Mabsout “more qualified than they are and who is at least honest and not feeding on the miseries of others or monopolizing a righteous cause in order to keep a job or acquire a position or get a promotion, some one who could shed the light on the real cause of the Palestinian plight” [6]?

Gilad Atzmon: This is hardly surprising and it is totally consistent with everything I say in The Wandering Who? It is only natural that people who identify politically as Jews would also act out of Jewish self interest. Philip Wiess, American pro Palestinian activist admitted to me in an interview that as a Jew he operates out of Jewish self interest.

Silvia Cattori: For ten years I have observed the anomalies within the Movement in European countries; I am therefore in a position to endorse your arguments. In Switzerland too, unfortunately, people have allowed themselves to be manipulated, yielding to fear. The fight against anti-Semitism has become a priority for the Swiss BDS movement. Entire meetings focusing on Gilad Atzmon’s so-called “anti-Semitism” are being organized. In other words, it would appear that the millions of Palestinians, who have been surviving in refugee camps for over 60 years, have really nothing to expect from this movement?

Gilad Atzmon: For more than a while, myself and others are very suspicious of the BDS. For some peculiar reason the BDS in the West is dominated by Jewish activists. Though the BDS’ principle is valid and worth a fight, it has become clear to many of us that something went wrong along the way. Last month we have seen BDS calls to stop Norman Finkelstein; this month we see BDS calls to stop me. Great, isn’t it. The BDS is now used to stifle freedom within the solidarity discourse.

Interestingly enough, already in 2006 I predicted that any attempt to interfere with freedom of speech may turn the BDS into a banal witch hunt facilitator. But recently I have seen some very worrying signs. We learned for instance that in spite of the global financial crisis that hit Britain very hard, British trade with Israel increased by no less than 34%. So on the one hand we have height BDS activists engaged in a successful weekly vigil against an Israeli beauty product shop, they even manage to destroy a few concerts but at the same time Israel is shipping tons of goods into this country. What is going on here?

Silvia Cattori: It would seem that your underlying motivation is to alert Goyim, encouraging them to stop being driven by guilt, being compliant and accepting to be humiliated. And to understand that as long as speech is not free, Israel will continue to gain time until its stranglehold on Palestine will become irreversible?

Gilad Atzmon: In my world there is no division between Jews and Goyim. My big desire is to say what I want to say. I believe that my message is pretty crucial for people, who are interested in peace, be it Jews or Goyim. It is clear to me that with Israel and Jewish lobbies pushing for more and more wars, Israel and its lobbies set themselves as the biggest threat to world peace. It is also clear to me that Jewish communities fail to restrain Israel and its lobbies. And the message for all of us is clear. It is down to us to save our planet. This planet is our home and we are sitting on a ticking bomb, we better hurry up, we better speak out before it is too late.

Silvia Cattori

See also:
- « Gilad Atzmon talks about his latest book “The Wandering Who?” - Interview with Gilad Atzmon », by Silvia Cattori, 27 September, 2011.
- « Israeli occupation: Calling A Spade A Spade - An Interview with Gilad Atzmon », by Silvia Cattori, 25 February, 2011.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The silviacattori.net will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.

[1La Parabole d’Esther : Anatomie du Peuple Élu
Editions Demi Lune
The French translation of Gilad Atzmon’s book The Wondering Who? is available for sale at the Voltairenet online bookstore:

[2See the letter of IJAN and UJFP: « L’UJFP et l’IJAN écrivent à Info-Palestine suite à la publication d’une interview de Gilad Atzmon », 21 October, 2011.

See also : « Gilad Atzmon répond à ses détracteurs », 25 October, 2011.

[3See under note (2) the letter of IJAN and UJFP.

[4See: « Ali Abunimah and Gilad Atzmon at the OK Corral, by Roger Tucker », 24 March, 2012.


On February 9, 2012, Caroline Finkelstein, a member of IJAN, wrote to one of the associations in these terms: « We would like to draw your attention to the controversy that exists regarding Gilad Atzmon. We would advise you to inquire about that person before inviting him. IJAN (International Jewish Anti-zionist Network of which we are members) and UJFP (Union Juive Française pour la Paix) reject the arguments of Gilad Atzmon. We personally would not attend any conference with Atzmon ».

[6Daniel Mabsout: « The Holy Cow of the Palestinian Cause: Gilad Atzmon versus the Palestinian Establishment », 26 March, 2012.